Board
of Regents Policies and Procedures Manual:
Information Technology
ITEM 114-104-R0102
No.
1 -
Privacy, Security and Monitoring (New)
SCOPE
This
policy applies to all MUS individuals using MUS-owned or managed computing and
information resources (hereinafter "users").
PURPOSE
This policy outlines the general rules governing the MUS’s rights and
responsibilities to monitor the use of the computers and networks it operates,
and the balance between those rights and responsibilities and the expectation of
a reasonable degree of privacy in the use of those facilities by users.
REQUIREMENTS
Each campus will report semi-annually to the Office of the Commissioner of Higher
Education on the specific implementation of these policies.
The MUS has the legal responsibility to ensure that the computers and networks it operates
are used appropriately. The data contained on those computers and transmitted on
those networks are presumed to be MUS property unless MUS’s rights are
otherwise limited by law, policy, or contract. In any case, the data
contained on those computers and transmitted on those networks is subject to
monitoring and/or copying by the MUS. That is, in order to meet its
obligations, the MUS, through individuals operating within the course of their
legitimate job duties, may periodically, routinely, or for a specific purpose
monitor activity on its computers and network. These individuals may
include IT personnel and appropriate administrators and supervisors on each
campus.
The types of
activities the MUS may monitor and on which it may maintain records include, but
are not limited to:
1. e-mail sent
from or received by e-mail systems operating on MUS sites;
2. accesses to
external Web sites originating from MUS sites;
3. other
significant external network activity originating from or received by MUS
sites; and
4. the contents
of permanent storage devices attached to MUS computers (including installed
software and software version information, system data, and user data).
The MUS's general
interests in these aspects stem from both its obligations to prevent misuse of
its resources and its commitments to its users to provide certain services, such
as backups of system and user data for use in case of system failures,
reasonable and robust network performance, optimized access paths for frequently
accessed Web sites, optimized network performance for other types of network
activity (e.g., video conferencing, remote high speed computation), guarantees
that system software is updated appropriately and efficiently, and
blocking and/or detecting the sorts of disruptive activity characterized as
hacking or system cracking, virus/worm infection, and denial of service.
Routine network monitoring typically focuses on "general" patterns of
use, but attempts to optimize performance, detect anomalies, or track down
possible intrusions may lead to more specific monitoring. Activities such
as routine system backups always involve collecting and copying user-specific
data and the contents of e-mail systems. In copying data for these purposes the
MUS gains the right to use such copies appropriately; it does not gain
intellectual property rights to the information contained in the data.
Personal
information gained through monitoring will be held in confidence by the MUS when
required by law. Records obtained by monitoring may be used within the MUS by
MUS officials, employees and agents for purposes appropriate to the management
and administration of the MUS, including the investigation of possible
misconduct by a user or a third party. In addition, records will be
released if necessary to comply with a court order or other legal instrument
binding upon the MUS or its officials. Requests for records by members of
the public will be complied with in a fashion consistent with the law on public
access to records and privacy. Persons requesting public disclosure of
such records may be assessed the reasonable costs of time and material involved
in meeting the request.
Except for the
identification, investigation, and prevention of misconduct by a user, including
violations of law, MUS officials, employees, and agents will not divulge
personally identifiable information obtained through monitoring.
CLASSES OF RESOURCE
USERS
The computing and
information technology resources owned and managed by the MUS are used by three
distinct classes of users, who gain access to information technology resources
through very different relationships with the MUS, and hence to which different
acceptable use policies must apply.
Employees.
These include individuals who are regular MUS employees, as well as visiting
faculty, "adjuncts," and other persons having officially
sanctioned, unpaid affiliations with a MUS campus. These users gain access
to MUS information technology resources by virtue of their employment or
sanctioned affiliations.
Students.
These include individuals registered as full- or part-time students at a MUS
campus. These users gain access to MUS information technology resources as
part of the service package the campus provides to registered students.
Patrons.
These are casual users who use MUS information technology resources that are
made available to the public at large, e.g., people who use public access
terminals in MUS libraries.
Because there are
dramatic differences in the relationships between the MUS and individuals in
each of these three groups, care must be taken to clearly identify the specific
rights and responsibilities that pertain to each group of users. Also, a given
individual may fall into more than one of the user classes, and hence gain
different rights by virtue of participation in different types of activities.
For example, MUS employee "Smith" gains "employee user"
rights by virtue of his/her employment, and exercises those rights while at
work. If Smith also registers for a class he/she gains "student user"
rights for use in his/her academic pursuits. Finally, Smith may at any time
visit a campus library and exercise "patron user" rights by using a
public access terminal. It is reasonable to expect that the rights and
responsibilities of an individual such as Smith differ depending on the context
of his/her access, and the policies that apply to a given incident will
therefore depend on the specific context of use.
|
|
 |
|
|