ACADEMIC SENATE
MINUTES
DATE: October 11, 2007
PRESENT: Agnes Samples Jeff Sanders
Rakesh Sah Bruce Brumley
Audrey ConnerRosberg Lorrie Steerey
Johanna Mitchell Keith Edgerton
Gershon Bulgatz Mark Hardt
Craig
McKenzie John
Cech (ex-officio)
ABSENT: Sandie Rietz – excused Alicia Esteves (student) – excused
David Garloff (ex-officio) Tasneem Khaleel (ex-officio)
Gary Young (ex-officio) Mary Susan Fishbaugh (ex-officio)
Karen Heikel (ex-officio) George White (ex-officio)
Terrie Iverson (ex-officio) Stacy Klippenstein (ex-officio)
GUESTS: Valerie
PRESIDING: Audrey ConnerRosberg, Chair
Audrey ConnerRosberg called the meeting to order at 3:46 p.m.
in room B57 of the
The minutes of September 27 were accepted as presented.
I New Senator
Steve Coffman has agreed to fill the vacant at-large spot on the Senate. He will be at the next meeting.
II. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION
Item 8 Committee Roster 2007-2008. Student representatives.
Ž Motion by Lorrie Steerey,
seconded by Craig McKenzie to accept
Item 8.
Ž Motion carried.
Item 4 AAS in Power Plant Technology. New program.
Item 4.a PPT 250 Power Plant Basics. Delete course.
Item 4.b PWRP 201 Power Plant Equipment and Operations. New course.
Item 4.c PWRP 203 Energy Sources and Conversion. New course.
Item 4.d PWRP 210 Turbines, Accessories and Basic Operation. New course.
Item 4.e PWRP 214 Power Generation. New course.
Item 4.f PWRP 216 Electrical System Components and Protections. New course.
Item 4.g PWRP 218 Advanced Plant Operations and Troubleshooting. New course.
Item 4.h PWRP 296 Cooperative Education/Internship. New course.
Ž Motion by Keith Edgerton,
seconded by Bruce Brumley to accept
Items 4, 4.a, 4.b, 4.c, 4.d, 4.e, 4.f, 4.g, and 4.h.
It was noted that there is no tenure-track faculty member in charge of this program. The program itself looks excellent, but the budget does not indicate where the money will come from to fund this new program.
John Cech, Dean of the College of Technology, noted that he does have a 0.5 FTE faculty line built into the budget, and at the October 31 Provost Council meeting he will be required to present staffing plans for all COT programs. It was cited that the Senate needs that staffing and budget information.
Ž Motion by Lorrie Steerey,
seconded by Keith Edgerton to table
Items 4, 4.a, 4.b, 4.c, 4.d, 4.e, 4.f, 4.g, and 4.h until the Senate receives
the appropriate budget data.
Dean Cech noted that they need this program approved soon because it has a Spring 2008 start. It was cited that the paperwork indicates it will be a Fall 2008 start.
Ž Motion carried with 3 abstentions.
The Senate noted that it has no problem with the curriculum, which looks great.
Item 6 EDCI 385 Junior Field Experience. Change prerequisite and course description.
Ž Motion by Bruce Brumley,
seconded by Lorrie Steerey to accept
Item 6.
Ž Motion carried.
III. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS
A. Discussion Topics for President Gamble Next
Week
The Senate agreed the agenda for next week will be:
B. Discussion with Local Media
Keith Edgerton stated that he was contacted by Mary Pickett from the Billings Gazette. She is interested in talking with the Senate about current Senate issues. It was agreed that the Chair, Vice Chairs, Secretary, and Dr. Edgerton as Past Chair should meet with Ms. Pickett.
C. Morale and Engagement Survey Data: What do we want to do with the results?
It was cited that the basic results of the survey indicated that staff and faculty are satisfied with their jobs, the students, and their immediate supervisor/department chair. However, they are very dissatisfied with the upper administration, with the Senate, and with the budget process. Faculty do not feel respected, they do not feel their opinions matter, or that they are valued. It was noted that we should hear President Gamble’s opinion on the results before taking action.
It was observed that Senators have to talk with faculty about what they want their Senate to do. Senators can also get on their respective department meeting agendas to update faculty about Senate activities and receive feedback.
D. Summer Schedule Memo Retraction
It was suggested that the Summer Schedule memo be retracted as the whole Senate had not reviewed the final version. It was noted that faculty members have been approaching Senators stating how pleased they are about the memo and that the Senate has taken a stand on this issue.
It was agreed that the memo will not be retracted.
The meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m.
rjrm